Objective To discuss the intervention effect and clinical application value of Imoove rehabilitation training on the recovery of lower limb motor function in patients in the recovery period of stroke. Methods A total of 80 patients in the recovery period of stroke who visited The Fifth People’s Hospital of Wuhu from January 2024 to December 2025 were included. They were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group using a random number table, with 40 cases in each group. The observation group received intervention through the combination of the conventional rehabilitation plan and Imoove rehabilitation training, while the control group only received conventional rehabilitation treatment. The intervention period for both groups was 4 weeks. The Fugl-Meyer assessment-lower extremity (FMA-LE), the Berg balance scale (BBS), the 10-meter walk test (10MWT), and the modified Barthel index (MBI) were evaluated before and after the intervention, respectively. At the same time, the occurrence of adverse reactions during the rehabilitation training period should be continuously observed and recorded. Results Before the intervention, there were no statistically significant differences in the FMA-LE scores, BBS scores, 10MWT scores and MBI scores between the two groups (all P＞0.05). After one month of intervention, the observation data of both groups showed a positive trend compared to the baseline level. Specifically, the FMA-LE score, BBS score, and MBI score were all significantly higher than those before treatment in this group (all P＜0.05), and the duration of the 10MWT test was significantly shorter than that before treatment in this group (all P＜0.05). After the intervention, the FMA-LE score, BBS score and MBI score of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group (all P＜ 0.05), and the duration required for the 10MWT test was significantly shorter than that of the control group (P＜0.05). During the rehabilitation training period, no serious adverse events occurred in either group. The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 7.50%, while in the control group it was 12.50%. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P＞ 0.05). Conclusion Combining Imoove rehabilitation training with conventional rehabilitation can further promote the reconstruction of lower limb motor function in patients in the recovery period of stroke, improve their balance ability and walking function, enhance their ability in daily life activities, and the method is quite effective.