人工智能联合PBL教学模式应用于腹腔镜技能培训中的教学效果评价
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.安徽医科大学第一附属医院;2.匈牙利塞梅维什大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Evaluation of the teaching effect of the artificial intelligence combined with PBL teaching model in laparoscopic skills training
Author:
Affiliation:

1.The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University;2.Semmelweis University, Hungary

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 评价人工智能(artificial intelligence,AI)联合问题导向学习(problem-based learning,PBL)教学模式应用于腹腔镜技能培训中的教学效果。方法 选取2024年1月至2025年6月安徽医科大学第一附属医院普外科参加腹腔镜技能培训的80名外科规培学员及研究生,按随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组各40名。对照组采用传统PBL教学,观察组在传统PBL基础上联合AI技术支持的教学模块,包含AI辅助案例编写和智能反馈2个子系统。培训持续8周。培训结束时比较两组在腹腔镜操作技能考核、理论考试、自主学习能力和教学满意度4个维度的差异。结果 培训结束后,观察组腹腔镜操作技能考核成绩(87.56±7.12)分、理论知识测试成绩(89.22±6.34)分及自主学习能力量表评分(83.45±8.16)分,均高于对照组的(78.24±8.45)分、(79.64±7.81)分和(72.34±9.23)分(均P<0.001);在规培第1年、第2年及第3年学员中,观察组上述2项成绩均高于对照组,其中第2年及第3年学员的组间差异尤为明显。培训期间观察组平均参与率高于对照组(均P<0.05),且教学满意度高于对照组(85.00% vs 67.50% ),但差异无统计学意义(χ2=3.38,P=0.066)。结论 AI联合PBL教学模式有助于提高规培学员的腹腔镜操作和理论成绩,增强其自主学习能力,且学员接受度较高,建议在外科规培和研究生教学中进一步推广。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the teaching effect of the artificial intelligence (AI) combined with problem-based learning (PBL) teaching model in the training of laparoscopic skills. Methods 80 surgical trainees and postgraduate students from the General Surgery Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University who participated in laparoscopic training from January 2024 to June 2025 were selected. They were divided into the control group and the observation group according to the random number table method, with 40 participants in each group. The control group adopted the traditional PBL teaching method, while the observation group received teaching modules that combined traditional PBL with AI technology support, including two subsystems: AI-assisted case writing and intelligent feedback. Training lasted 8 weeks. At the end of the training, the differences were compared between the two groups in four aspects: laparoscopic operation skill assessment, theoretical examination, self-learning ability, and teaching satisfaction. Results After training, the assessment scores of laparoscopic operation skills (87.56±7.12) points, theoretical knowledge test scores (89.22±6.34) points, and self-learning ability scale scores (83.45±8.16) points of the observation group were all higher than those of the control group (78.24±8.45) points, (79.64±7.81) points and (72.34±9.23) points (all P<0.001). Among the trainees in the first, second and third years of the residency training, the assessment scores of laparoscopic operation skills and theoretical knowledge test scores of the observation group were all higher than those of the control group, and the differences between the groups were particularly significant in the second and third years of residency training. During the training period, the average participation rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (all P<0.05), and the teaching satisfaction of the observation group was also higher than that of the control group (85.00% vs 67.50%), but the difference was not statistically significant (χ2 =3.38, P=0.066). Conclusion The AI combined with PBL teaching model can improve residents’ and postgraduates’ laparoscopic skills and theoretical knowledge, strengthen their capacity for self-directed learning, and is well received by trainees. It is suggested that this approach be further promoted in surgical residency training and graduate student education.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

吴伙,何明明,贾振亚.人工智能联合PBL教学模式应用于腹腔镜技能培训中的教学效果评价[J].生物医学工程学进展,2026,(3):260-263

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-05-21
  • 最后修改日期:2026-06-11
  • 录用日期:2026-06-11
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-08-19
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码