前馈控制风险模式联合集束化护理在老年重症肺炎机械通气患者中的应用价值
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

广州市胸科医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Application value of feedforward control risk model combined with bundled nursing in elderly patients with severe pneumonia undergoing mechanical ventilation
Author:
Affiliation:

Guangzhou Chest Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨前馈控制风险模式联合集束化护理在老年重症肺炎机械通气患者中的应用效果。方法 本研究采用回顾性队列研究设计,按时间顺序分组。收集2022年12月至2024年6月广州市胸科医院收治的43例接受常规集束化护理方案的老年重症肺炎机械通气患者临床资料并纳入对照组,收集2024年7月至2025年12月广州市胸科医院收治的43例接受前馈控制风险模式联合集束化护理方案的老年重症肺炎机械通气患者临床资料并纳入研究组。比较两组患者康复指标(机械通气时间、总住院时间、血象恢复时间)、呼吸及氧合指标[动脉血氧分压(partial pressure of oxygen,PaO2)、氧合指数(oxygenation index,OI)、动脉血二氧化碳分压(arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide,PaCO2)]、心理状态[心理韧性量表(Connor-Davidson resilience scale,CD-RISC)]及生活质量[世界卫生组织生存质量测定简表(World Health Organization quality of life-brief,WHOQOL-BREF)]、并发症发生情况。结果 研究组患者机械通气时间、总住院时间均显著短于对照组(均P<0.05),血象恢复时间显著早于对照组(P<0.05)。护理后研究组呼吸频率、PaCO2均显著低于对照组(均P<0.05),PaO2、OI、CD-RISC评分、WHOQOL-BREF评分均显著高于对照组(均P<0.05)。研究组患者总并发症发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 前馈控制风险模式联合集束化护理应用于老年重症肺炎机械通气患者可促进疾病康复,改善肺呼吸及氧合功能,提高心理韧性及生活质量,减少并发症发生。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the application effect of the feedforward control risk model combined with the bundled care in elderly patients with severe pneumonia undergoing mechanical ventilation. Methods This study adopted a retrospective cohort study design and was grouped in chronological order. The clinical data of 43 elderly patients with severe pneumonia who received conventional bundled care plan and underwent mechanical ventilation in Guangzhou Chest Hospital from December 2022 to June 2024 were collected as the control group. The clinical data of 43 elderly patients with severe pneumonia who received the feedforward control risk model combined with bundled care plan and underwent mechanical ventilation in Guangzhou Chest Hospital from July 2024 to December 2025 were collected as the study group. The rehabilitation indicators (mechanical ventilation time, total hospital stay, blood count recovery time), respiratory and oxygenation indicators (partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), oxygenation index (OI), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2)), psychological state (Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC)) and quality of life (World Health Organization quality of life-brief (WHOQOL-BREF)), and the occurrence of complications were compared between the two groups. Results The mechanical ventilation time and total hospital stay in the study group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (all P< 0.05), blood count recovery time was significantly earlier than that of the control group (P<0.05). After the nursing intervention, the respiratory rate and PaCO2 in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05), and the PaO2, OI and the scores of the CD-RISC and the WHOQOL-BREF were significantly higher than those in the control group (all P<0.05). The complication rate in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of the feedforward control risk model combined with bundled care in elderly patients with severe pneumonia undergoing mechanical ventilation can promote the patient’s disease recovery, improve pulmonary breathing and oxygenation functions, enhance psychological resilience and quality of life, and reduce the occurrence of complications.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

徐小毛.前馈控制风险模式联合集束化护理在老年重症肺炎机械通气患者中的应用价值[J].生物医学工程学进展,2026,(3):106-112

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-05-07
  • 最后修改日期:2026-07-07
  • 录用日期:2026-07-07
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-08-19
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码