T淋巴细胞亚群联合NLR在免疫性血小板减少症患儿中的分布特征及临床意义
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.河南医药大学第一附属医院/平顶山市第一人民医院;2.平顶山市第一人民医院;3.河南医药大学第一附属医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


The distribution characteristics and clinical significance of T lymphocyte subsets combined with NLR in children with immune thrombocytopenia
Author:
Affiliation:

1.The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Medicine/The First People''s Hospital of Pingdingshan;2.The First People''s Hospital of Pingdingshan;3.The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Medicine

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 分析 T 淋巴细胞亚群联合中性粒细胞 / 淋巴细胞比值(Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio,NLR)在免疫性血小板减少症(Immune thrombocytopenia,ITP)患儿中的分布特征和临床意义。方法 采用回顾性研究设计,选取 2023 年 1 月至 2025 年 1 月在新乡医学院第一附属医院和平顶山市第一人民医院就诊的 134 例 ITP 患儿为研究对象,选取同期两医院体检健康儿童 100 例纳入对照组。比较两组 T 淋巴细胞亚群(CD3 + 细胞、CD3+CD8 + 细胞、CD3+CD4 + 细胞、CD3+CD4-CD8 - 细胞)和 NLR;基于两组差异绘制受试者操作特征(Receiver operator characteristic,ROC)曲线,评估 T 淋巴细胞亚群联合 NLR 对 ITP 的预测效能;按病程将 ITP 患儿分为新诊断组(首次确诊、病程<3 月,n=92 例)、持续性组(病程 3~12 月,n=8 例)、慢性组(病程>12 个月,n=34 例),比较三组患儿 T 淋巴细胞亚群和 NLR。结果 ITP 组 CD3 + 细胞、CD3+CD4 + 细胞水平均显著低于对照组(均 P<0.05),CD3+CD8 + 细胞、CD3+CD4-CD8 - 细胞、NLR 均显著高于对照组(均 P<0.05);T 淋巴细胞亚群和 NLR 在 ITP 中的联合预测效能高于单一指标(均 P<0.05)。不同病程 ITP 患儿中,仅 CD3 + 细胞、NLR 组间差异有统计学意义(均 P<0.05),其中新诊断组 CD3 + 细胞高于持续性组(P<0.05),慢性组 NLR 高于新诊断组(P<0.05)。持续性组因样本量较小(n=8),统计效能有限,相关结果需谨慎解读。结论 ITP 患儿存在 T 淋巴细胞亚群分布紊乱和 NLR 升高的病理状态,两项指标联合可提升 ITP 辅助诊断与风险预测效能。

    Abstract:

    Objective To analyze the distribution characteristics and clinical significance of T lymphocyte subpopulations combined with the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in children with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Methods A retrospective study design was adopted. A total of 134 children with ITP who were treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University and the First People’s Hospital of Pingdingshan City from January 2023 to January 2025 were selected as the study subjects, and 100 healthy children during the same period were selected as the control group. Compare the T lymphocyte subpopulations (CD3+cells, CD3+CD8+cells, CD3+CD4+cells, CD3+CD4-CD8-cells) and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) between the two group. Based on the differences between the two groups, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate the predictive efficacy of T lymphocyte subpopulations combined with NLR for ITP. According to the course of disease, the ITP children were divided into newly diagnosed group (first diagnosis, disease duration<3 months, n=92), persistent group (disease duration 3-12 months, n=8), and a chronic group (disease duration>12 months, n=34). The T lymphocyte subpopulations and NLR values were compared among the three groups. Results The CD3+ cells and CD3+CD4+ cells in the ITP group were lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05), while the CD3+CD8+ cells, CD3+CD4-CD8- cells, and NLR in the ITP group were higher than those in the control group (all P<0.05). The combined predictive efficacy of T lymphocyte subpopulations and NLR for ITP was higher than that of any single indicator (all P<0.05). Among ITP children with different disease durations, only CD3+ cells and NLR showed statistically significant differences between groups (all P<0.05). Specifically, the newly diagnosed group had higher CD3+ cells than the persistent group (P<0.05), and the chronic group had higher NLR than the newly diagnosed group (P<0.05). The sample size of the persistent group was small, with limited statistical power, so the relevant results need to be interpreted with caution. Conclusion Children with ITP exhibit pathological states of disordered T lymphocyte subpopulation distribution and high NLR expression. Combining these two indicators can enhance the efficacy of auxiliary diagnosis and risk prediction for ITP.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张阳阳,刘利利,王书磊,李培岭. T淋巴细胞亚群联合NLR在免疫性血小板减少症患儿中的分布特征及临床意义[J].生物医学工程学进展,2026,47(2):184-188

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-04-07
  • 最后修改日期:2026-05-12
  • 录用日期:2026-05-17
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-06-15
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码