不同呼吸管理方式对胸腹部肿瘤质子放疗摆位精度的影响:基于CBCT的对比研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

合肥离子医学中心

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


The influence of different respiratory management methods on the positioning accuracy of proton radiotherapy for thoracic and abdominal tumors: A comparative study based on cone beam computed tomography images
Author:
Affiliation:

hefei ION medical center

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨在锥形束计算机断层扫描(cone beam computed tomography,CBCT)图像引导下,深吸气屏气(deep inspiration breath-hold,DIBH)与自由呼吸两种呼吸管理方式在胸腹部肿瘤质子放射治疗中的摆位精度差异,为临床优化呼吸控制策略提供依据。方法 回顾性分析2022年1月至2025年4月于合肥离子医学中心接受质子放疗的50例胸腹部肿瘤患者,根据呼吸管理方式分为自由呼吸组(n=25)和DIBH组(n=25)。所有患者在前5次放疗中接受CBCT引导,记录X、Y、Z 轴方向摆位误差、三维矢量误差(three-dimensional vector error,TVE)及角度偏差,同时比较治疗床调整幅度、校正时间、重定位发生率及体重变化对固定与呼吸管理效果的影响。结果 DIBH 组在Y 轴方向误差和三维矢量误差方面显著优于自由呼吸组(P<0.05),Pitch角度误差亦更小(P<0.05)。DIBH组校正时间更短(P<0.05),重定位率更低(P<0.05)。两组体重波动对固定与呼吸管理的影响无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论 在CBCT图像引导下,DIBH呼吸管理方式较自由呼吸可显著提高胸腹部肿瘤质子放疗的摆位精度与定位效率,降低重定位风险。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the difference in positioning accuracy between deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and freebreathing under cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image guidance in proton radiotherapy for thoracic and abdominal tumors, and to provide a basis for optimizing respiratory management strategies in clinical practice. Method A retrospective analysis was conducted on 50 patients with thoracic and abdominal tumors who received proton radiotherapy in Hefei Ion Medical Center from January 2022 to April 2025. They were divided into a free breathing group (n=25) and an DIBH group (n=25). All patients received CBCT guidance during the first 5 radiotherapy sessions, and the positioning errors in the X, Y, and Z directions, three-dimensional vector errors (TVE), and angle deviations were recorded. At the same time, the adjustment amplitude of the treatment bed, correction time, repositioning incidence, and the impact of weight changes were compared. Results DIBH group had significantly lower Y-axis error and three-dimensional vector error than the free breathing group (P<0.05), with smaller Pitch angle error as well (P<0.05). The correction time was shorter in the DIBH group (P<0.05), and the repositioning rate was lower (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the influence of body weight fluctuation on fixation and respiratory management between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Under CBCT image guidance, the DIBH method can significantly improve the positioning accuracy and efficiency of proton radiotherapy for thoracic and abdominal tumors compared to free-breathing, reduce the risk of repositioning.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张帆.不同呼吸管理方式对胸腹部肿瘤质子放疗摆位精度的影响:基于CBCT的对比研究[J].生物医学工程学进展,2026,47(2):51-55

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-04
  • 最后修改日期:2026-05-08
  • 录用日期:2026-05-09
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-06-15
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码