不同头部固定系统在脑肿瘤放疗中的机械稳定性与误差控制分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

蚌埠医科大学第一附属医院 放疗科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Analysis of mechanical stability and error control in different head immobilization systems in brain tumor radiotherapy
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Department of Radiation Oncology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University,Bengbu City,Anhui Province,233000;2.P.R. CHINA

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 比较不同头部固定系统(head immobilization systems,HIS)在脑肿瘤放疗中的机械稳定性与误差控制效果,为临床精准放疗提供依据。方法 纳入2022年1月至2024 年12月蚌埠医科大学第一附属医院放疗科接受脑肿瘤放疗的80 例患者,按HIS的不同,将入选患者分为热塑面罩系统(thermoplastic mask system,TMS)组、发泡胶系统(vacuum cushion system,VCS)组和立体定向框架系统(stereotactic frame system,SFS)组。治疗前均行计算机断层扫描(computed tomography,CT)模拟定位并采用加速器自带千伏锥形束CT(kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography,kV-CBCT)影像引导校正,记录三维平移及旋转误差,计算系统误差(Σ)、随机误差(σ)、总向量误差(total vector error,TVE)及安全边界(M值),并进行单因素及多元线性回归分析。结果 三组平移及旋转误差均在临床允许范围内。SFS组在平移、旋转、Σ与σ方面均显著低于其他两组(均P<0.05),VCS组次之,TMS组最大。根据Van Herk 公式计算的安全边界亦呈相同趋势。治疗阶段分析显示,TMS 组误差随分次增加而轻度升高,VCS 组基本稳定,SFS 组几乎无变化。多元线性回归结果提示,固定系统类型及放疗分次次数为影响误差的主要因素(均P<0.05)。结论 不同HIS 在脑肿瘤放疗中的稳定性存在差异。SFS 定位精度最高,适用于高剂量小靶区放疗;VCS 兼顾舒适性与稳定性;TMS 在多分次放疗中应结合影像引导以校正误差。合理选择与规范使用固定系统可显著提升脑肿瘤放疗的精准度与安全性。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the mechanical stability and setup accuracy of different head immobilization systems(HIS) in brain tumor radiotherapy and provide evidence for precise treatment planning. Methods A total of 80 patients underwentg radiotherapy for brain tumors at the Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University from January 2022 to December 2024 were enrolled. Based on the type of head immobilization system used, patients were divided into three groups: the thermoplastic mask system (TMS) group, the vacuum cushion system (VCS) group, and the stereotactic frame system (SFS) group. All patients underwent computed tomography (CT) simulation positioning before treatment and image-guided correction was performed using the kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography (kV-CBCT) system built into the accelerator. Translational and rotational errors were recorded to calculate systematic error (Σ), random error (σ), total vector error (TVE), and margin (M). Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to identify major influencing factors. Results The translational and rotational errors across all three groups were within acceptable clinical limits. The SFS group was significantly lower than the other two groups in translation, rotation, Σ and σ (all P<0.05), followed by the VCS group and TMS group. The calculated safety margins showed the same trend. Over treatment fractions, setup deviation slightly increased in the TMS group, remained stable in the VCS group, and was minimal in the SFS group. Regression analysis identified immobilization type and fraction number as the main factors affecting setup error (all P<0.05). Conclusion Mechanical stability varies among HIS in brain tumor radiotherapy. The SFS provides the best positioning precision and reproducibility, the VCS balances comfort and stability, while the TMS requires frequent image guidance during multi-fraction treatments. The rational selection and standardized use of immobilization systems can significantly enhance the precision and safety of brain tumor radiotherapy.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

朱宇.不同头部固定系统在脑肿瘤放疗中的机械稳定性与误差控制分析[J].生物医学工程学进展,2026,(1):87-92

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-11
  • 最后修改日期:2025-12-22
  • 录用日期:2025-12-24
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-04-14
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码